WASHINGTON, DC (May 2, 2011)
—Collectively, women and minorities lost ground in America’s corporate boardrooms between 2004 and 2010, according to Missing Pieces: Women and Minorities on Fortune 500 Boards—2010 Alliance for Board Diversity Census. Six years after the first ABD Census, this report shows that white men still overwhelmingly dominate corporate boards with few overall gains for minorities and a significant loss of seats for African-American men. In the Fortune 100, between 2004 and 2010, white men increased their presence, adding 32 corporate board seats, while African-American men lost 42, and women—particularly minority women—did not see an appreciable increase in their share of board seats. In the Fortune 500, which is included in this year’s report as well, the overwhelming majority of seats were held by white men.

The study was compiled by the Alliance for Board Diversity (ABD), a collaboration of five leading organizations—Catalyst, The Executive Leadership Council (ELC), the Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility (HACR), Leadership Education for Asian Pacifics, Inc. (LEAP), and The Prout Group, Inc.

“With so many qualified women and minority candidates available for board service, it is staggering to find that no real progress has been made in the past six years to advance minorities and women into the boardroom,” said Ilene H. Lang, Chair of ABD and President and CEO of Catalyst. “Research has shown that diverse teams produce better results. In particular, Catalyst research revealed that more diverse boards, on average, are linked with better financial performance. Corporate America has the opportunity to seize the advantage that a more diverse board can yield in this increasingly competitive global economy.”  

Key findings from this report include:

For more information on this study and the Alliance for Board Diversity, please visit www.theabd.org, or ABD member websites:
Catalyst: www.catalyst.org; Susan Nierenberg, snierenberg@catalyst.org, (646) 388-7744
The Executive Leadership Council® (ELC): www.elcinfo.com; Michael Dutton, mdutton@elcinfo.com, 703-517-3550
The Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility (HACR): www.hacr.org; Mostafa Abdelguelil, MAbdelguelil@hacr.org, (202) 682-4012
Leadership Education for Asian Pacifics, Inc. (LEAP): www.leap.org; Rima Matsumoto, rmatsumoto@leap.org, (202) 412-4190
The Prout Group, Inc: www.proutgroup.com; Betsy Bruening, bbruening@proutgroup.com,
(216) 771-2258

METHODOLOGY
The Alliance for Board Diversity (ABD) utilizes a Census methodology. The ABD Census counts Fortune 500 board directors to provide an accurate measurement of the representation and progress of women and minorities in business leadership and to allow for comparable statistics from year to year.

ABD Census analyses are based on companies on the Fortune 500 list published on May 3, 2010. ABD examined Fortune 500 companies because they are recognized and serve as the most influential businesses in the United States, ranked by revenue each year.

THE ALLIANCE FOR BOARD DIVERSITY
Founded in 2004, the Alliance for Board Diversity (ABD) is a collaboration of four leadership organizations: Catalyst, The Executive Leadership Council, the Hispanic Association on Corporate Responsibility, and Leadership Education for Asian Pacifics, Inc. The Prout Group, Inc., an executive search firm, is a founding partner of the alliance and serves as advisor and facilitator. The groups have a common goal to enhance shareholder value by promoting inclusion of women and minorities on corporate boards.

ADDENDUM:  Quotes from Alliance for Board Diversity members: CEOs of Catalyst, ELC, HACR, LEAP, and The Prout Group, Inc. 

“Both the ABD Census and the Catalyst Census underscore the unacceptable lack of women in general—and minority women even more so—in the corporate boardroom,” said Ilene H. Lang, Chair of ABD and President and CEO of Catalyst. “At a time when restoring shareholder value and overall confidence in the economy are at the forefront of our nation’s attention, companies can ill afford to ignore what Catalyst research has shown—that significant financial gains can be made when women are present in greater numbers on the boards of U.S. corporations.”
 
"Few will debate that inclusion and the diversity of thinking that it brings to business challenges creates real shareholder value," said Arnold W. Donald President and CEO of ELC. "That's why the decline in the collective presence of underrepresented groups on the boards of America’s largest corporations as reported in this study is more than a little concerning. We at ELC together with our ABD partners plan to make a meaningful contribution in helping America's corporations address this missed opportunity."

“Companies that want to achieve success in a global marketplace need a board that reflects the communities in which they do business as well as the population overall. Ensuring Hispanic representation on their board of directors and in the executive suite is essential to achieving this diversity,” said HACR President & CEO Carlos F. Orta. “HACR’s goal is to increase Hispanic presence on corporate boards and executive staffs, which will help to identify best practices in the area of corporate responsibility. “

“While Asian and Pacific Islander (API) representation on corporate boards has increased over the past decade, APIs are still woefully underrepresented in leadership roles,” said J.D. Hokoyama, LEAP President and CEO. “As part of our ongoing efforts to achieve full participation for APIs, LEAP’s multi-pronged approach of developing people through our leadership development programs; measuring representation through LEAP research; and informing society at large through multiple venues including our reports and key partnerships like ABD are helping to further empower our communities in addressing this critical issue.”

“We were disappointed with the results from the latest ABD report,” said Pat Prout, President & CEO of The Prout Group, Inc. “From a search firm perspective, we know that nominating committees often desire diversity when considering board candidates.  It is evident, however, that they are not getting it.”